Lagos, Nigeria – In a bustling hall in Abuja six years ago, the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) performed a ritual of economic hope. It handed out 46 new licenses—a “challenger brigade” designed to break the duopoly of MTN Nigeria and Airtel Africa. The message was clear: innovate, compete on price, and liberate the 100 million Nigerians still digitally stranded.
Today, the scoreboard tells a different story. Only four of those 46 challengers have launched meaningful commercial networks. Two have been acquired for spare parts. The rest exist solely on paper: ghost operators in a ₦5.5 trillion telecom market.
The Great Un-Connection
MTN and Airtel control 85% of mobile subscriptions and over 90% of data revenue. Glo (Globacom) and 9mobile hold most of the remainder. That leaves precisely 0.02% market share for all 46 new licensees combined—many of which have never purchased a single base station.
“We licensed competitors the way a library lends out books—good intentions, no follow-through,” said Funke Opebiyi, a telecom analyst at Lagos-based Stears. “Most of these companies raised just enough capital to pay for the license, then froze when they saw the real cost of network rollout.”
Under the NCC’s framework, the “Challenger License” category was supposed to be lightweight: lower spectrum fees, relaxed rollout obligations, and emphasis on niche services (rural broadband, enterprise VPNs, or regional voice). But what the fine print didn’t say was that the two incumbents had already locked up every profitable mast site from Victoria Island to Kano.
Where Are They Now?
Of the 46, only FibreOne, Tizeti, Spectranet (pre-2022), and ipNX have built visible infrastructure. Their success, however, is narrow: each serves high-value corporate or residential estates, not the mass market. Tizeti’s “Wi-Fi-as-a-Service” model works in Lagos suburbs because it avoids expensive voice licensing and builds above ground, not on scarce cell towers.
The other 42 exist in a gray zone. Some sold their licenses to small ISPs who cannot afford backbone transmission. Several were fronts for political rent-seeking—briefcase companies that hoped MTN would buy them out. A few simply vanished after the 2022 currency devaluation doubled their equipment import bills.
“We spent $2 million on license fees, then realized a single 10km fiber trench in Abuja costs $350,000,” said a director of one challenger who spoke on condition of anonymity. “We are a telecom company in name only. Our ‘network’ is a server rack in a storage unit.”
The Three Walls Challengers Hit
1. Tower access is a closed shop. MTN owns or leases 90% of shared tower space through IHS Towers and American Towers. Challengers must pay the same colocation fees as the incumbents—no discount for being “small.”
2. Foreign exchange paralysis. Most challengers need dollars for base stations, routers, and microwave links. With the naira losing 60% of its value in three years, capital budgets evaporated. One challenger told TechCabal in 2023: “We raised $5 million in 2021. By 2024, that was worth ₦1.8 billion instead of ₦7 billion. We couldn’t buy a single Ericsson radio.”
3. Regulatory rollout timelines were a fantasy. NCC rules gave challengers 24 months to cover five local government areas. But getting permits for Right of Way (RoW) can take 18 months per state. Many simply surrendered their licenses rather than pay state governments for multiple RoWs simultaneously.
Could a True Challenger Still Emerge?
Ironically, the only genuine new rival in the past decade didn’t come from the 46. Starlink—a foreign satellite operator—launched in Nigeria in early 2023 with zero local license hype. It has already amassed over 25,000 active users, mostly high-brow estates and banks. Because Starlink bypasses terrestrial towers and state RoW fees entirely, it faces none of the structural traps that killed the 42.
“Starlink is what those 46 licenses were supposed to produce: price pressure and choice,” Opebiyi said. “But you can’t regulate your way into competition when the incumbents own the ground, and the state makes digging that ground a nightmare.”
What Next?
The NCC is quietly reviewing the Challenger License framework. Proposals include scrapping mandatory voice network requirements (let them be data-only), offering 5-year tax holidays on imported gear, and forcing tower companies to reserve 10% of colocation spaces for new entrants at subsidized rates.
But for the 42 paper operators, it is likely too late. Their licenses expire between 2025 and 2027. Most will not renew.
“We had 46 challengers,” said a veteran telecom lawyer in Lagos, “but only three things actually challenge a duopoly: cheap capital, open infrastructure, and consistent policy. Nigeria gave out licenses. It forgot to give out the other three.”
0 responses